During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Developer signing certificates that establish software provenance
# GPU acceleration。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Medical Cannabis Products Provide Sustained Improvements in Patients With Chronic Pain, Anxiety, and Depression。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
Eyedropper - sample the color of any pixel on the page
特朗普聲稱已為美國爭取到18兆美元投資。他表示：「在12個月內，我爭取到超過18兆美元從全球各地湧入的（投資）承諾。」。同城约会是该领域的重要参考